BlueSafe
Excavator Use as Crane Risk Assessment

Excavator Use as Crane Risk Assessment

  • • 100% Compliant with Australian WHS Acts & Regulations
  • • Fully Editable MS Word & PDF Formats Included
  • • Pre-filled Content – Ready to Deploy Immediately
  • • Customisable – Easily Add Your Logo & Site Details
  • • Includes 2 Years of Free Compliance Updates

Excavator Use as Crane Risk Assessment

Product Overview

Identify and control organisational risks associated with Excavator Use as Crane through a structured, management-level Risk Assessment that supports planning, governance, and systems-based controls. This document helps demonstrate Due Diligence under the WHS Act, reduces operational liability, and supports consistent, defensible WHS Risk Management across your business.

Risk Categories & Hazards Covered

This document assesses risks and outlines management controls for:

  • Governance, Legal Compliance and PCBU Duties: Assessment of officer due diligence, PCBU obligations, consultation duties, and the integration of excavator-as-crane operations into the organisation’s WHS governance framework.
  • Procurement, Hire and Plant Selection: Management of selection criteria for excavators and lifting attachments, supplier verification, hire agreements, and ensuring plant is fit-for-purpose for crane-type lifting tasks.
  • Design, Engineering and Attachment Configuration: Evaluation of engineering controls, load charts, rated capacity, quick-hitch and lifting point design, and configuration of attachments used for lifting operations.
  • Competency, Training and Licensing: Protocols for verifying operator competency, high-risk work licensing where applicable, VOC processes, and ongoing training for lifting operations using excavators.
  • Planning, Lift Engineering and Risk Assessment Systems: Assessment of lift planning processes, lift studies and engineering input, pre-start risk assessments, and integration with broader project risk management systems.
  • Supervision, Coordination and Contractor Management: Management of supervisory arrangements, communication protocols, principal contractor interfaces, and coordination of multiple PCBUs on shared worksites.
  • Inspection, Maintenance and Plant Integrity Management: Systems for scheduled inspections, pre-operational checks, defect reporting, maintenance records, and ensuring structural integrity of excavators and lifting gear.
  • Systems for Load Control, Exclusion Zones and Traffic Management: Controls for load stability, signalling, spotters, designated exclusion zones, and interaction between excavators, vehicles, and pedestrians.
  • Environmental Conditions, Emergency Preparedness and Incident Management: Assessment of ground conditions, weather, overhead services, and the development of emergency response, rescue and incident escalation procedures.
  • Documentation, Records, Monitoring and Continuous Improvement: Management of policies, procedures, permits, lift plans, training records, inspections, audits, and review processes to drive continual WHS improvement.

Who is this for?

This Risk Assessment is designed for Business Owners, Project Managers, Plant Managers and Safety Officers responsible for planning, approving and overseeing excavator use as a crane on construction, civil and infrastructure projects.

Hazards & Risks Covered

Hazard Risk Description
1. Governance, Legal Compliance and PCBU Duties
  • • Lack of clear organisational policy on using excavators as cranes leading to ad hoc decisions and inconsistent practices
  • • Failure to recognise that an excavator being used as a crane may be ‘plant that lifts or suspends loads’ and a potential item of high risk plant under WHS Regulations
  • • Inadequate understanding by officers and senior managers of their due diligence obligations under the WHS Act 2011 in relation to lifting operations
  • • Failure to identify and comply with relevant Australian Standards and Codes of Practice (e.g. AS 1418, AS 2550 series, Safe Design of Structures, Managing Risks of Plant in the Workplace Code of Practice)
  • • No documented risk assessment specific to ‘excavator use as crane’ across the organisation, leading to inconsistent site‑level controls
  • • Inadequate consultation with workers, HSRs, contractors and principal contractors regarding the risks of using excavators as cranes
  • • Poor integration of lifting risk controls into overall WHS management system, project WHS plans and contractor management frameworks
  • • Inadequate process to verify that subcontractors and plant hirers have appropriate systems, competencies and insurances for lifting activities
  • • Lack of clear criteria for when excavator use as a crane is prohibited and when purpose‑built cranes are mandatory
2. Procurement, Hire and Plant Selection
  • • Procurement of excavators without lifting charts, rated capacity information or manufacturer approval for use as a crane
  • • Selection of excavators that are not designed, configured or fitted with the necessary safety systems to perform lifting (e.g. no load charts, no overload protection, no certified lifting point)
  • • Use of generic hire agreements that do not specify lifting duties, resulting in mismatched plant capability and intended use
  • • Failure to obtain and retain plant documentation, including manuals, compliance plates, proof of inspection and design registrations where applicable
  • • Inadequate evaluation of ground conditions, reach, lifting radius and load characteristics when selecting the size and configuration of excavator to be used as a crane
  • • Using quick hitches or attachments not rated or certified for lifting loads, or with incompatible load ratings
  • • Cost‑driven decision‑making that favours using available excavators in lieu of appropriate cranes, without a structured risk‑based justification
  • • Poor specification of safety features at procurement, such as rated lifting points, check valves, load moment indicators (LMI) or similar limiting devices
3. Design, Engineering and Attachment Configuration
  • • Use of non‑engineered or uncertified lifting points, lifting lugs, or home‑made attachments on the excavator
  • • Inappropriate quick hitch or coupler systems that are not positively locked or not certified for lifting applications
  • • Lack of engineering verification that the boom, arm, hydraulics and slew system are capable of the intended lifting loads and duty cycles
  • • Failure to consider dynamic effects, side loading, and out‑of‑radius loading in system design, leading to instability or structural failure
  • • Attachment configuration that changes the centre of gravity or rated capacity of the excavator without updated load charts or engineering assessment
  • • No formal management of change process when new attachments or ancillary lifting gear (e.g. grabs, clamshell buckets, pipe lifters) are introduced
  • • Inadequate design of communication and signalling systems between operator and dogger/rigger, resulting in miscommunication during lifts
  • • Absence of engineered control measures for working near services, structures or public spaces when using an excavator as a crane
4. Competency, Training and Licensing
  • • Excavator operators lacking formal training in lifting operations, crane principles and load charts, despite being competent in excavation tasks
  • • Supervisors, doggers and riggers not understanding the specific limitations and risks of excavators used as cranes compared to conventional cranes
  • • Failure to ensure that high risk work licences (e.g. dogging, rigging) are held where required for lifting operations and load slinging
  • • No formal competency assessment or verification of competency (VOC) specific to excavator lifting tasks and associated procedures
  • • Inadequate training on organisational policies, lifting plans, emergency procedures and communication protocols relating to excavator use as a crane
  • • Over‑reliance on informal on‑the‑job learning without documented training outcomes, leading to inconsistent practices and knowledge gaps
  • • Failure to keep training records current, including licences, equipment‑specific familiarisation and refresher training
  • • Contractor personnel undertaking lifts with excavators without the principal contractor verifying licences, competencies and induction completion
5. Planning, Lift Engineering and Risk Assessment Systems
  • • Lack of formal lift planning for lifts conducted with excavators, particularly for non‑routine, heavy or complex lifts
  • • Inconsistent or superficial risk assessments that do not adequately consider ground conditions, underground services, overhead obstructions, load characteristics or environmental factors
  • • No systematic process to classify lifts (e.g. routine vs non‑routine, simple vs complex, critical lifts) and adjust planning and controls accordingly
  • • Failure to coordinate lifting operations with other site activities, leading to conflicts, congestion or exposure of other workers to lifting hazards
  • • Inadequate documentation of lifting plans, including exclusion zones, communication methods, emergency procedures and load paths
  • • Use of generic SWMS or procedures that do not address the specific risks associated with excavators being used as cranes on a particular site
  • • Poor integration of geotechnical or structural information into planning, resulting in unstable ground or insufficient bearing capacity for lifting operations
  • • No formal review or approval process for high‑risk or complex lifts using excavators
6. Supervision, Coordination and Contractor Management
  • • Insufficient supervision of lifting operations involving excavators, leading to deviations from plans and procedures
  • • Unclear roles and responsibilities between principal contractor, subcontractors, plant hire companies and site supervisors in relation to lifting safety
  • • Contractor supervisors lacking knowledge of the client’s policies and expectations regarding excavator use as cranes
  • • Multiple contractors operating plant simultaneously without effective coordination, increasing potential for collisions or encroachment into exclusion zones
  • • Supervisors being responsible for too many activities or work fronts to provide effective oversight of lifting operations
  • • Poor communication between shifts or work crews, leading to changes in lifting arrangements not being communicated or documented
  • • Failure to verify that hired‑in plant arrives with competent operators, necessary documentation and fit‑for‑purpose attachments for lifting
  • • Inadequate enforcement of site rules relating to lifting, including exclusion zones, permit conditions and communication protocols
7. Inspection, Maintenance and Plant Integrity Management
  • • Inadequate preventative maintenance of excavators used for lifting, increasing likelihood of mechanical or hydraulic failure under load
  • • Failure to conduct regular statutory inspections where required, including for high risk plant or lifting accessories associated with excavators
  • • Lack of systematic pre‑start and post‑use inspection processes that capture defects affecting lifting safety
  • • Use of worn, damaged or uncertified lifting accessories (e.g. chains, slings, shackles, hooks) with excavators
  • • Poor record‑keeping for maintenance, inspections, repairs and modifications relating to plant used for lifting
  • • Repairs and adjustments carried out by unqualified persons or using non‑genuine parts, compromising structural integrity or rated capacity
  • • Failure to quarantine defective plant and lifting gear from service, allowing continued use despite identified issues
  • • Hydraulic leaks, control malfunctions or stability systems not being promptly reported and addressed, particularly where they affect lifting operations
8. Systems for Load Control, Exclusion Zones and Traffic Management
  • • Inadequate organisational standards for exclusion zones around excavators operating as cranes, leading to workers or public entering hazard areas
  • • No consistent process to design and implement traffic management plans accounting for excavator lifting operations and suspended loads
  • • Failure to manage interaction between excavators, other mobile plant and pedestrians during lifting tasks
  • • Insufficient controls for working adjacent to public roads, footpaths or occupied buildings when performing lifts with excavators
  • • Variable practices around tagging, barricading and signage for lifting zones, resulting in confusion or non‑compliance
  • • No system to manage tandem lifts or interaction between multiple excavators and cranes on the same work front
  • • Inadequate procedures for working near overhead powerlines, underground services or other critical infrastructure while using excavators as cranes
  • • Insufficient planning for unexpected load movements, swing or failure, and lack of pre‑defined escape routes for workers
9. Environmental Conditions, Emergency Preparedness and Incident Management
  • • Lack of formal criteria for suspending excavator lifting operations during adverse weather conditions (e.g. high wind, lightning, poor visibility, heavy rain)
  • • Inadequate emergency response planning for incidents involving excavators used as cranes, such as plant overturning, dropped loads or contact with services
  • • No clear communication and escalation pathways when unsafe conditions arise during lifting tasks
  • • Insufficient drills or training on emergency scenarios related to excavator lifting, resulting in slow or ineffective responses
  • • Failure to systematically investigate and learn from incidents, near misses and mechanical failures associated with excavators used as cranes
  • • Inadequate integration of first aid, rescue capability and emergency equipment with the potential risks of lifting operations
  • • Lack of planning for environmental impacts of major incidents (e.g. hydraulic spills, structural damage to adjacent assets) during lifting
10. Documentation, Records, Monitoring and Continuous Improvement
  • • Fragmented or incomplete documentation for excavator lifting operations, making it difficult to verify compliance or learn from past work
  • • Poor retention of lift plans, risk assessments, maintenance records and competency evidence related to excavator use as cranes
  • • Limited monitoring of performance indicators related to lifting safety, such as near misses, non‑conformances or plant defects
  • • Lack of structured internal audit or inspection programs targeting lifting operations involving excavators
  • • Inconsistent implementation of corrective and preventive actions following audits, incidents or regulatory inspections
  • • No systematic process to review and improve WHS management arrangements for excavator lifting in light of operational experience, technological changes or legislative updates
  • • Over‑reliance on paper‑based systems that are not standardised or centrally accessible, leading to outdated or lost information

Need to add specific hazards for your workplace?

Don't worry if a specific hazard isn't listed above. Once you purchase, simply log in to your Client Portal and add your own custom hazards at no extra cost. We take care of the hard work—creating the risk ratings and control measures for free—to ensure your document is compliant within minutes.

Legislation & References

This document was researched and developed to align with:

  • Work Health and Safety Act 2011
  • Work Health and Safety Regulations 2017
  • Model Code of Practice – Managing the Risks of Plant in the Workplace: Guidance on managing risks associated with plant, including excavators used for lifting.
  • Model Code of Practice – Construction Work: Requirements and guidance for safe construction activities involving lifting operations.
  • Model Code of Practice – How to Manage Work Health and Safety Risks: Framework for identifying hazards, assessing and controlling risks.
  • AS 2550 series (Cranes, Hoists and Winches – Safe Use): Guidance for safe use of lifting equipment and crane-type operations.
  • AS 1418 series (Cranes, Hoists and Winches – Design, Construction and Testing): Technical requirements relevant to lifting configurations and attachments.
  • AS/NZS 4801 / ISO 45001: Occupational health and safety management systems – requirements for systematic WHS management.
  • AS/NZS ISO 31000:2018: Risk management — Guidelines
Standard Risk Assessment Features (Click to Expand)
  • Comprehensive hazard identification for all activities
  • Risk rating matrix with likelihood and consequence analysis
  • Existing control measures evaluation
  • Residual risk assessment after controls
  • Hierarchy of controls recommendations
  • Action priority rankings
  • Review and monitoring requirements
  • Consultation and communication records
  • Legal compliance references
  • Sign-off and approval sections

$79.5

Safe Work Australia Aligned